今年松脂是否增产

rosinlin

2003年松香总产量增乎？减乎？

liuhui

等年会吧

rosinlin

一起等待11月1日吧！！！
到时候大家都不用争了。

轻松背包

等吧

peter

因为内销的突然增加，外贸的减少对市场供求影响已显得不太必要，后市松香生产总量已相对有限，而外贸需求一直不减，即使前期增产也无法左右后市大局。

CGRWW

内销的突然增加，多是炒菜

CGRWW

肯定增产5 -10万吨

燕子

说说理由

蒸汽

肯定增产5 -10万吨？？？？？？？我也想听听理由~~~~~~~~~~~~
有钱可以收到脂，我相信，因为据说梧州松脂厂收脂的价格一直不低，但是不是就表示松脂多呢？全国产量会增那么多？？？？

c1353228p

Bank did not review the signatures suffered a defeat

( @- U5 [( e0 I9 g; i1 I
Taiwan tourism, suffered thieves,Casque Beats, credit card overdraft more than 190,000 malicious NT. After the bank to pay back the money drives the main card.  
Lishui City in November last year, Court of First Instance sentenced Liandu credit card bank themselves the responsibility of malicious overdraft. Bank refused to accept the appeal. Yesterday, Lishui in the hospital verdict: dismissed the appeal and upheld the original verdict.  
travel wallet was stolen

8 b, }- O; t8 c+ q( k: n. Q* I 19 万多 NT was overdrawn
4 k1 m7 Q$ ~/ m6 n" a3 e: I# d/ i6 }
Longquan, Lishui, Mr. items, because doing business travel often, to facilitate early In September 2005, he applied for a bank in Lishui a credit card. Mr. items as long as this credit card master card can get the signature card overdraft. But never thought to bring this card to his own convenience, but also  
2009 年 11 On 20 March, Mr Xiang to visit Taiwan, I did not expect the next day around 3pm wallet was stolen, wallet, credit cards and ID cards are also subsequently stolen.  
the beleaguered Mr. items Lishui quickly contacted family members to help them report the loss of credit cards, but the bank says I need to report the loss. So,Casque By Dr Dre, Mr. items were called to the bank report the loss. Fortunately, Mr. Banks told the item is no credit card records. Mr Xiang was relieved.  
( H+ _' R9 |; Z+ H6 ?6 M" H; q Unexpectedly, the night he received a phone bank and was told his credit card business in Taiwan, three times a consumption of more than 190,000 Taiwan dollars overdrawn.  
) E6 q+ e' v! B5 t$ M% r1 b3 i% w Soon, the bank began a reminder. And the bank repeatedly fruitless negotiations, desperation, Mr. item bank to court had to seek explanation.  
Bank: a main signature card of Mr. items: A bank should review the signature

" ?  n5 m. }& s0 k: I that this more than 190,000 Taiwan dollars in Taiwan consumer overdraft, the bank can not do the review signature, Mr. items such a then you can not play a role to facilitate customer.  
consumption, and that what this credit card security? Banks are not doing the review signed duties, the responsibility should be borne by the banks themselves.  
Court: A bank should bear responsibility

/ c5 i6 `! @+ e' Q& M7 P Bank: The appeal was dismissed

Lishui City Liandu court, after hearing that the credit card consumer credit card transactions, direct legal relationship with the cardholder is the occurrence of credit card issuing bank, not the tenants.  
4 K. ]; ~+ M, `( C# |4 J cardholders credit card spending, it means that the cardholder authorized by the issuing bank or its bank account to pay the overdraft line of credit from the amount corresponding to the tenants.  
/ S) }) L& k& E# ^ accept the cardholder's issuing bank to authorize the appropriate payment, should first examine whether the license holder to pay the true meaning of that. Therefore, businesses should be submitted to the issuing bank transaction evidence review before issuing banks to review and correct payments to the business. That is, banks should review this item consumption is not my President signed.  
3 z: J3 `- H6 N/ O& G( H& K addition, provide credit card issuing bank and the merchant terminal equipment spending is another contractual relationship.  
: \4 k$ C! k, l8 T relevant institutions to provide credit card spending to merchants, terminal equipment, means that credit card spending is the extension of financial services of the issuing bank, the cardholder's credit card spending in the business, is the relationship between the cardholder and the issuing bank- .  
Therefore, whether the business is authorized to review the signatures and other relevant agencies, and commercial credit card spending is to do rigorous examination of the risks of identity can not be borne by the real cardholder.  
$ u4 S$ Y; m" H6 \- x Therefore, the court decision, this non-autographed items, Mr. I generated more than 190,000 NT overdraft act invalid,casque monster, they should bear their own responsibility.  
bank refused to accept the appeal to the Intermediate People's Court in Lishui City, yesterday, Lishui in Court decisions rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict, ditto.