生物质化工论坛用户守则

baeshengwl5

不要迷恋哥，哥只是个传说
/ Q1 l' O7 r" B* r: r$ w

jinggdao168

不要迷恋哥，哥只是个传说

zheng377

Director  
9 ~+ D8 V1 f3 D$ E+ R) T
$ h7 K- f" v$ z; @) U2 M7 d after his release he wanted to The procuratorate found that handwriting identification showed that IOU was forged CABLING after release.  
present testimony CABLING perverted crimes fugitive, suspected of helping two of his friends to destroy or forge evidence XingJu.  
& J( A0 T- z, x8 D. X incident
2 R, S1 l3 Z, l  _. s0 Y& ~% T! [
4 @' a) E1 f9 f# k' q1 B
2004, the Erqi District Prosecutor's Office received a report material anti-corruption department, said the Zhengzhou Municipal CABLING Authority in any outdoor advertisements Director, Fall 2001, the National Advertising Department of the Organizing Committee Deputy Minister of rum when an ad in the process of setting the company's outdoor advertising permit period, the manager of 3.8 million the company received commissions; the same period, a CABLING Zhengzhou in the issuing process Outdoor advertising companies to set a permit, the manager of the company received the commission to send 10 million.  

% r  a$ @/ A: L! i( ^7 O then CABLING be prosecuted.  

3 @( r' |5 p( h7 Z overturn
& j. `. y# ?* j, n7 V
Lok Ma said the huge amount of property in arrears, the Director
2 e9 x5 N* ?! X! w2 S" x
2006 in early, early release after CABLING commutation.  
! k" |1 F; B$ u
prosecutors found that two judgments, respectively, showed strong CABLING 70 million due to completion of and interest on 47,250 yuan, 340,000 yuan owed to Zhao.  
0 T+ Z) V* [9 B8 {6 Q2 x

/ M6 }3 M$ Q, \5 F1 V identification
$ D0 C0 O( R. @2 g
IOU is a fake
) [; T- W; w4 ~4 l3 m
. b, E" G# H: P  ? Prosecutor believes that the key issue is still there on two IOUs. Department of Zhengzhou City Procuratorate Kongshen IOU then commissioned to identify organs of Forensic Sciences.  
2 [6 r; u+ x5 L7 l! y6 z6 @ 2007 年 12 27, Southwest University of Political Science Centre for Forensic Forensic concluded that: submission of the Party Bi Qiang, B CABLING time in January 2001 the nominal .20 day  
in June 2004 before the reported bribery CABLING has been accepted for investigation Procuratorate.  
Procuratorate thus believe that strong and CABLING are complete lies, the other an IOU may be false.  
9 K' ^- Z( \9 G7 \1 ` Subsequently, at the basis of Zhengzhou City Procuratorate Kongshen identification books, the completion of strong, Zhao suspected of helping destroy or falsify evidence of crime, Zhengzhou City, the transfer of public security organs.  
) }. k" f( I4 @# f7 j- a6 z4 ^1 A Bi strong statement then said the public security organ, is looking for him to help CABLING, forged loan agreement the two sides, creating a false lawsuit. Later, Zhao also admitted that the fact that there is no borrowing.  
2008 年 5 27, completed the writing strong Procuratorate to the Zhengzhou City ) at the agreement itself, he does not owe me money CABLING.  
at large

false evidence of re-offending fled
0 }7 X/ I4 T0 G8 w
( o" C# O4 z9 a# C& J& m: S
) p. A+ L$ o% n then completed the intensity and signed a 70 million CABLING hosted on behalf of the deposited Borrower shall, signed date is January 20, 2001. Later, Zhao also signed a 340,000 yuan CABLING borrowing amended.  
Next,casque dr dre, the two will CABLING to court,casque dre, asking him to return the debt and interest.  
the facts clear, August 30, 2006, the court ruled: CABLING effect of this decision within ten days after the plaintiff completed the repayment of 70 million strong loan and interest 47,250 yuan, more than a total of 747,250 yuan.  
and Zhao another and soon the debt dispute hearing, the court Zhao CABLING 340,000 yuan within 10 days to repay debt.  
3 s# a% g: Y& ?: D7 v4 g carrying into effect the court ruling two CABLING came in 2007 in Zhengzhou City Procuratorate Kongshen Department on  
) J& c# w. T1 Y# \7 B present, strong and Zhao Bi They were suspected of helping forge evidence prosecutors arrest was CABLING will face another new offense - the crime prevent testimony, the public security organ is its capture .  
* n" C" W& {2 M# C3 G( g$ } Although BI Qiang, Zhao as false, but there are two judgments of law. To this end, Zhengzhou City People's Procuratorate to the case to the High-tech District Prosecutor's Office Civil Division for the line. The Bureau of Zhengzhou City Intermediate Court to lodge a protest, the protest in writing to respond quickly, Zhongyuan District, Zhengzhou City Intermediate People's Court asked the court to re-trial.  
yesterday, Zhengzhou High-tech District Prosecutor's Office news came recently,casque monster beats, the Central Plains District Court quashing the original civil judgments, dismissed the plaintiff completed the strong, Zhao's claim.

wmczlyhe

7 v  y/ v$ S; A- m' o4 M我们要让如此的贴永恒下去

huanleguil

你好他好我好
# s' b9 `" E* X3 j2 r! o. w大家都好 顶顶更快乐