|
Survey: How do you escape being hit by thieves, who claim 15 million lawsuit against catch up?
# O9 C* p3 W a% n* { & B3 r9 o `4 ~ E
red light heavily on three young lad fell to the ground unconscious. Strange that the three victims did not fall to the ground to get people to pity, on the contrary, given the public full of onlookers, It turned out that the three young man were car thieves. . r* t" r4 z2 m) L" n
Honda car drivers more than enthusiastic people Mr Tsim and explained the situation to the police: three minutes before the accident, two guy is stealing the liberation of West Plum door electric vehicle battery market, after the discovery of the past members of the public shouted, At this point, the people Mr Tsim happened to pass by there, then floored catch up, driving a hundred meters away from the car accident that took place.
) ]( c' {) B1 W- P8 h sitting on motorcycle last 19 years Shaomou surface, the three thieves were injured the most important one, was taken to hospital treatment. Hospital nearly a month, total cost of medical expenses over 30,000 yuan. Subsequently identified, Shaomou splenectomy were assessed to eight disabled, intestinal rupture repair has been assessed to ten disabled. And Mr. Chan is also seriously damaged the car, but has kept chilling endless Mr. Chan is that he chased the thief out of justice, which in itself is a courageous act, but, who sued was hit and became the defendant. + V% [' h! ?# V2 S2 ~
complaint in respect that he is a thief
$ p8 a# o" q G$ Q7 d: x - H. S+ b9 N9 _: A8 x5 I# O, [: W
saying not wash your dirty linen in public, but Shaomou say that, although immoral theft, but it does not mean that the thief is not the right to life and health legal protection. 5 months after the accident, in September 2008,chaussure foot nike, Shaomou Chong'an District People's Court of Wuxi City, immediately submitted a petition to require Mr. Chan and co-owned vehicles, more than 150,000 yuan compensation for the losses. And Shaomou the suit and made no secret of his identity theft, bluntly indicated that he is a thief. g6 R% h0 R% l0 a0 I& k9 R
Shaomou said, plate two motorcycles from north to south along the West to escape the liberation, Zhan catch a car driving to the county before the West Street when the motorcycle ride on the back of my crashing, cause I Zhuangfei fall to the ground injured. request a decree, and Zhan Zhan a vehicle owned company 33245.68 yuan compensation for medical expenses, these payments 1,350 yuan, 2,100 yuan nursing care, hospital food subsidy 414 yuan, 500 yuan transportation costs, lost income, costs 3,400 yuan, disability compensation 98,268 yuan,chaussures football, 15,000 yuan in emotional, Total 154,277.68 yuan. During the trial scene, Mr. Chan told the judge,mercurial vapor superfly, Shaomou the so-called accidents are caused by their impact is purely intentional framing a car accident because the driver panic to escape, improper driving, the driver should recover losses Shaomou. And a direct collision with the motorcycle is another driving a normal car, should also be told if you want to sue the owners of the car.
% a+ `: H+ x8 _ Zhan and vehicle belongs to a company responsibility.
. y( D7 e/ y O$ r& Q4 J by the court of first instance dismissed
' L$ \3 s1 J+ [ `3 @$ }. \3 z4 X 2 @7 U# o; v" Y: b! B& f: t
9 y& {) ?& c9 r9 n' J
4 z6 W: y; G- `
Liu Jian said the judge, riding motorcycles without a direct collision, motorcycle accident injuries caused Shaomou with Samaritan's Mr CHIM no direct causal relationship. November 19, Wuxi City, the people of 法院对该案 were Chong'an verdict. The court held that because Mr. Chan said Shaomou car crash while riding his motorcycle, and causes a traffic accident caused the injury, but it provides the Traffic Accident car crash has not found Mr. Chan two motorcycles, so Shao based on an alleged inadequate, the court shall not accept.
% K" T% [- q& d6 y; R3 [' s- S In addition, Mr. Chan, who found Shaomou suspected theft, the car chase is a positive and fulfilling their civic obligation to catch up in no misconduct, so the Shaomou asked Mr. Chan is not the idea of ??liability to support. Shaomou give up on other claims arising from either the vehicle and the parties, the court respect for the individual will not interfere. But the claims made for Shaomou, all Court of First Instance dismissed. |
|